The US: signs of heightening trade credit risk?

付款習慣

  • 美國
  • 化學/制藥,
  • 建築,
  • 耐用消費品,
  • 電子/計算機技術,
  • 金融服務,
  • 一般經濟,
  • 機械/工程

2019年06月25日

Despite solid fundamentals, underpinned by persistently strong household and business confidence, clouds are developing over the U.S. economy.

Fiscal and trade policy risks have increased, posing a double threat to the strong domestic economy. There is still confidence that the next recession won’t start in 2019, however the risk of a downturn occurring sooner than expected has increased.

U.S. respondents are far more likely to sell on credit to B2B customers than last year

Proportion of total B2B sales made on credit in USA

Survey respondents in the U.S. have historically shown a preference for selling to their B2B customers on cash rather than on credit terms. However, current survey findings point to a shift in preference to selling on credit this year. 55.2% of the total value of U.S. respondents’ B2B sales was reported to be made on credit (up from 44.6% last year). It is highly likely that the larger proportion of credit sales this year reflects the improved export trade relations following the USMCA agreement in 2018. U.S. respondents’ exports to Canada increased to 35% from 28% last year, while their exports to Mexico increased to 30% from 22%. When asked to explain the reasons for their increased export activity to Canada, most U.S. respondents (70%) said that the increase in USMCA exports was stimulated by economic reasons, and 30% by government trade policies. In regards to increasing exports to Mexico, 9 in 10 U.S. respondents said this was due to both economic reasons and reasons connected with government trade policies. 

Payment terms granted by U.S. respondents are the swiftest in the USMCA region

Despite being far more likely to sell on credit to B2B customers than one year ago, respondents in the U.S. do not appear similarly inclined to set more relaxed payment terms. Most U.S. survey respondents (89%) requested quicker payment of invoices from B2B customers than one year ago, with terms averaging 24 days (down from 27 days last year). These are the shortest in the USMCA region, and compare to an average of 37 days in Canada (up from 25 days last year) and 27 days in Mexico (down from 33 days one year ago). In Brazil, the average is 38 days (up from 32 days last year).  

Checking buyers’ creditworthiness and reserving against bad debts form the basis of US respondents’ credit management policy

Consistent with the increased use of trade credit in B2B transactions, there is a heightened perception of credit risk amongst U.S. respondents. This may explain why their credit management policies rotate around the assessment of a prospective buyer’s creditworthiness prior to any trade credit decision. Survey findings point to U.S. respondents (35%) performing creditworthiness checks more often than their peers in Canada (30%), and less often than their peers in Mexico (38%) and Brazil (43%). Reserving against bad debts, which is meant to ensure financial stability should the assessment of creditworthiness prove inaccurate, is done by 28% of respondents in the U.S. vs. 33% in both Canada and Brazil, and by 18% in Mexico.

One fourth of the total value of U.S. respondents’ B2B invoices remain unpaid by due date

Payment duration in USA

Over the past year, the payment behaviour of U.S. respondents’ B2B customers improved notably. 73.6% of the total value of B2B invoices issued by U.S. respondents were paid on time (up from 59.5% last year). Despite this, over one-fourth of the total value of U.S. respondents’ invoices was not paid by the due date. On average, it takes U.S. respondents 39 days to turn these overdue invoices into cash (down from 51 days last year). To manage liquidity issues caused by late payments and reduce financial pressure on the business, many U.S. respondents (nearly 30%) needed to take measures to correct cash flow, or were forced to delay payment of invoices to their own suppliers. One in four respondents needed additional financing from external sources. On average, 1.3% of the value of B2B receivables was written off as uncollectable (compared to 1.2% last year).

U.S. respondents will expand use of credit management practices to mitigate trade credit risk over the coming months

Most U.S. respondents (55%) do not expect payment practices of B2B customers to change much over the coming months. 12% anticipate an improvement, while 33% expect an increase in late payments and in the number of U.S. firms filing for bankruptcy this year. For 29% of respondents, long overdue invoices (more than 90 days overdue) are expected to increase over the coming months, negatively affecting DSO. Moreover, 20% of U.S. respondents expressed concern that external borrowing conditions might become more difficult. This would negatively affect working capital and long-term investments in the business for 33% of respondents. To ensure their company’s financial flexibility and protect their business against the risk of payment default by their B2B customers, 51% of U.S. respondents will more often request cash payments from B2B customers. In the USMCA region, 63% of respondents in Mexico and 39% in Canada will request cash terms. Nearly half of U.S. respondents reported they will more often perform dunning activities, outsource collection of past due invoices or offer discounts for early settlement of invoices.

Overview of payment practices in the USA

By business sector

Average payment terms are longest in the chemicals sector and shortest in the agri-food sector

U.S. respondents from the chemicals and the machines sectors extended the longest average payment terms (averaging 38 days and 31 days from the invoice date, respectively). The shortest average payment terms were set by respondents in the agri-food sector (19 days), followed by the construction and transport sectors (averaging 20 days).

Trade credit risk is highest in the U.S. metals sector, and lowest in the transport sector

The value of overdue invoices is highest in the metals sector at 40.4% of the total value of B2B invoices. The ICT/electronics sector at 33% and the construction sector at 32% follow. The transport sector recorded a low of 11%.

Proportion of uncollectable receivables is highest in the ICT/electronics sector and lowest in the agri-food sector

The ICT/electronics sector in the U.S. reported that 1.9% of their B2B receivables were written off as uncollectable, the highest proportion in the country. The machines sector follows at 1.7%. At the lower end of the scale, the chemicals sector reported an average of 1.1% of B2B receivables written off as uncollectable and the agri-food sector less than 1%.


By business size

Large enterprises in the U.S. set the longest average payment terms for B2B customers

Uncollectable B2B receivables in USA

Respondents from large enterprises in the U.S. extended the longest and those from micro enterprises the shortest average payment terms to B2B customers (averaging 30 days and 21 days from the invoice date, respectively).  

Large enterprises took the longest to cash in overdue invoices

Over the past year, large enterprises in the U.S. recorded the highest increase in the proportion of B2B invoices paid on time (+20% on average). Due to this change, overdue invoices in large enterprises now account for 27.4% of the total value of B2B invoices. In contrast, on-time payment of B2B invoices issued by SMEs decreased 13% on average. Despite these changes, large enterprises are still the slowest to collect payment of invoices. The average time it takes to convert invoices into cash is 51 days from the invoice date for SMEs and 69 days for large enterprises.

SMEs in the U.S. recorded the highest rate of uncollectable receivables 

Despite collecting payment of invoices faster, SMEs have a significantly worse track record when it comes to collecting payment. SMEs in the U.S. recorded the highest proportion (2.0%) of B2B receivables written off as uncollectable. The average for large enterprises is 1.3% and for micro-enterprises less than 1%.

免責聲明

Each publication available on or from our websites, such as, but not limited to webpages, reports, articles, publications, tips and helpful content, trading briefs, infographics, videos (each a “Publication”) is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a recommendation or advice as to particular transactions, investments or strategies in any way to any reader. Readers must make their own independent decisions, commercial or otherwise, regarding the information provided. While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in any Publication has been obtained from reliable sources, Atradius is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in any Publication is provided ’as is’, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from its use, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied. In no event will Atradius, its related partnerships or corporations, or the partners, agents or employees thereof, be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in any Publication, or for any loss of opportunity, loss of profit, loss of production, loss of business or indirect losses, special or similar damages of any kind, even if advised of the possibility of such losses or damages.